【黃玉順】“賢能政治”將走向何方？——與貝淡寧師長教師一包養經驗商議

[Where, each episode will be eliminated until the remaining 5 participants challenge the five players] “Eliteism” was originally a political phenomenon and political trend under the Oriental modern civil system. Being still strengthened it to modern Confucianism and contemporary China, which is called “capable politics”. The “capital politics” advocated by Betanning is an anti-governmental political management theory, and is full of logical contradictions: it is an opposite of the system and a supplement to the system; it is determined to reject the system, and it is also a need for the system to ensure that it complies with the law. Betant’s criticism of the political genius is a common discussion that cannot stand the point, and the protection of “capable politics” is also very similar. The key to “capable politics” is not only its perceptual thinking method about the people, but also its inherently path toward extreme power.

【Keywords】elite theory; valuable politics (prosperity system); valuable system; valuable theory

In recent years, the “political meritocracy” represented by Daniel A. Bell has actually been marketed in China. Not long ago, Bettanning published his latest masterpiece Political Merit in ChinaThe Chinese version of ocracy and the Limits of Democracy “The Politics of Earnings-Why is it more suitable for China than choosing a civilian system” [①], and there is a market. In essence, the so-called “capable politics” (also translated as “prime system”) is a path toward extreme power, which has a serious negative impact on the political civilization trend of contemporary Confucianism, China and even the world, and needs to be analyzed and criticized.

1. The confusing logic of “capable politics”

The reason why “capable politics” (also translated as “capable system”) is extremely deceptive is not only because its similar and logical “theory” has catered to the needs of certain thoughts and certain levels and groups, and because its “wonderful” translation is enough to be mixed, it was able to win over the market.

(I) The concept of “economic politics” is confusing

Betanning applies “economic politics” and “publicity system” and its translation “economic politics” or “respect for money” are interested in creating concepts that are inadvertently confusing and misleading people.

1. The original meaning of “meritocracy” is well known that the word “meritocracy” comes from the 1958 anti-Utopian society work “The Rise of the Meritocracy” by British socialist Michael Young [②]. Some people have pointed out that:

Use “only paying attention” to translate meritocracy. Baobao.com In fact, there are certain disputes. In fact, the original merit refers more to the “advantages, value, and merit” of things, and does not have the moral meaning of “paying” in Chinese. As a political philosophy, the idea of ​​meritocracy was born in the 17th century inspiring the sensualism of Mongolian movement, but as a verb, Mike Yang, a British socialist and working party politician, was born in 1958. In his allegorical novel “The Prominence of Strong Man’s Rule”, the author imagines that the current world system in Britain collapsed, and the elite regime based on IQ was replaced by it. The outstanding workers-level members participated in the elite level, but the grudges of the lower-level people against them were more than the old and expensive clan level. Revenge broke out into violent reaction in 2034, overturning the elite’s rule.

Yang wrote an article in “The Newsletter” in 2001, criticizing the British Industrial Organization, Bobrell, who knew that he had taken meritocracy as an unknown person.Fashionable political management concepts are promoted. Yang said that the traditional British ruling elites had to be restrained because they knew that they were on the blood throne. They thought they were right to take advantage of the new and precious things that climbed up to the level of superior academic achievements, and thought that science itself had the moral integrity of its own authority (the effort and achievements of its own), so they doubled their rudeness to get good things without any scruples, forgetting and changing their original birth, resulting in the lower level falling into the spokesperson for the civilians, gradually losing voice in the civilians’ course, and finally a sense of political distancing. [③]

For a detailed and profound analysis of the “elite theory”, the author specifically recommends to readers the article “Energy Politics as Economic Politics – “Equivalent” Marketization under the New Unrestricted Theory” [④]. There are a few things that can be clearly determined here: the so-called “meritocracy” should be translated as “elite theory” or “elite system”, which is pure oriental language; but it is not a confrontation of the system, but a political phenomenon under the system; it is not a generalized essential feature of the system, but a political phenomenon in the current stage of the system.

This term is used to express the “elite” political reality of the current “elite theory” in the civil society, and is as thorny as the works of Mikel Yang: in general, the distribution of wealth and power is not based on a worldly family landscape, but based on his “care is usually at work, not Drag the suitcase, ” (merit) (understood as “IQ + Strength = Strength” [I+E=M]), the opportunity is equal to everyone in front of you; but in fact, due to differences in family life and growth environments, the conditions and opportunities for becoming “elites” are also different, and the actual result is to move towards another kind of dissatisfaction system. For example, american, a civilian country is “a country that is honored by an elite system” [⑤]. Therefore, Mikel Yang wanted to “defeat the elite’s doctrine”[⑥].

Of course, “elite theory” is the concept of modern oriental system, that is, it is not to oppose the oriental system, but to reflect on the existing state of the development of the oriental system in order to improve, that is, the British “a journey of staggering progress through welfare states in the post-war era and towards a more equal society” [⑦]; not only in this way, “elite theory” is even a dispute venue for differences under the oriental system. The reason why this “elite system” is an online term is because it is an “ideological form or organizational principle that becomes a problem due to new disobedience of power and social division of social situations” [⑧]. This is just used to understand some of the ills of the current stage of comprehensive Oriental politics. These ills have exacerbated the condensation of fluidity between social levels and the expansion of the rich, leading to the trend of genitalism that has emerged from the current american and the Eastern world. Therefore, with this “elite masterWhat is relative to “is not a genus, but a genus. From this we can see that according to the original meaning of this term, “elite theory” is neither a modern thing nor a opposite to the modern genus system, but a kind of sentiment of the modern genus system, which is a kind of development of the genus system to the current stage. The state to be improved.

In view of the above, I want to emphasize here: what is to be discussed in this article is not the “meritocracy” of Mike Yang, but the so-called “political” that Bethaning himself “created” meritocracy) and its translation of “efficient politics” or “respective system”.

2. Betanning’s concept of “political meritocracy”

The “efficient politics” that Betanning calls “effici